Page 21 - GURU DAKSHTA English

GURU-DAKSHTA Faculty Induction Programme (FIP) 19

3 Role of academic heads and faculties for quality higher education

Activities:
Self-Appraisal and Feedback form, ICT based exercise Case-study based discussions of good
research outputs in specific disciplines, Expert talks with discussion, Research proposal writing
exercise, using plagiarism software; short videos on research; interdisciplinarity in action: joint
session by resource persons from different disciplines to discuss a common topic; resources persons
from research ethics committee.

Assessments:
Learning outcomes may be assessed through Institutional case studies, Designing a draft research
proposal, recognising plagiarism through different means; peer assessment, reflection / self-
assessment.

Suggested Readings:(this is not an exhaustive list)
1. Kiel, D.H. 2015. Creating a Faculty Leadership Development Program. See-http://www.uog.
edu/sites/default/files/1215-faculty-leadership-md.pdf

2. Bond, Shreyl, L. Academic Leadership (Module-2). See-https://www.
acu.ac.uk/focus-areas/gender-programme/academic-leadership
3. Jeroen Huisman, Malcolm Tight (2016). Theory and Method in Higher Education Research,
Emerald Group Publishing

4. Dean O. Smith (2011). Managing the Research University, Oxford University Press
5. JenniferM.Case(2013).Researching Student Learning in Higher Education: A Social Realist,
Routledge

6. Shin, J.C., Arimoto, A., Cummings, W.K., Teichler, U. (Eds.) (2014).Teaching and Research
in Contemporary Higher Education: Systems, Activities and Rewards,Springer
7. Amanda H. Goodall (2009). Socrates in the Boardroom: Why Research Universities Should
Be Led by Top Scholars, Princeton University Pres

8. Jenkins, A, Resanna B. and Roger L. (2003) Teaching in Higher Education: Linking Teaching
with Research. Kogan Page

9. Pecorari, D. (2013). Teaching to avoid plagiarism: How to promote good source use. McGraw-
Hill Education (UK). Chapters: 1, 5, Appendix A