Page 52 - EVALUATION ENGLISH

References

1. All India Council for Technical Education: Recommendations for Examinationreforms. Retrieved from
https://www.aicte-india.org/sites/default/files/ExaminationReforms.pdf
2. Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich,
P.R., Raths, J., and Wittrock, M.C. (2001), A Taxonomy forLearning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of
Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.
3. Assessment Quality Cycle, University of Wollongong, Australia,https://www.uow.edu.au/curriculum-
transformation/aqc/index.html
4. Creating and Using Rubrics, Eberly Center, Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation, Carnegie
Mellon University,https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/assesslearning/rubrics.html

5. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (2009). The shift tolearning outcomes: Policies
and practices in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for OfficialPublications of the European Communities.
Retrievable from http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/3054_en.pdf

6. Guidance on Moderation, University of Warwick,https://warwick.ac.uk/ services/aro/dar/quality/
categories/examinations/moderation/moderation_g uidance.pdf

7. Haladyna, T.M. & Downing, S.M. & Rodriguez, M.C. (2002). A review of multiple- choice item-
writing guidelines for classroom assessment. AppliedMeasurement in Education, 15(3), 309-334.
8. Interpretive Structural Model (ISM) developed by Prof. Satsangi P.S.
9. Liu, Q. (2015). Outcomes-Based Education Initiatives in Ontario Postsecondary Education: Case
Studies. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.heqco.ca/
SiteCollectionDocuments/OBE%20ENG.pdf
10. Moderation Guidance, Institute for Academic Development, The University ofEdinburgh, https://www.
ed.ac.uk/institute-academic-development/learning-teaching/staff/assessment/moderation-guidance
11. Moderation Policy, Faculty of Education, University of Wellington, http://www.cad.vuw.ac.nz/wiki/
images/6/6d/FofEDModPolicy20132015.pdf

12. Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, Iowa State University, http://www.celt.iastate.edu/teaching/effective-
teaching-practices/ revised-blooms-taxonomy.

13. Richard Paul and Linda Elder (2007). Critical thinking Competency Standards:Standards, Principles, Performance
Indicators and Outcomes with a Critical Thinking Master Rubric. Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.
org/files/SAM_Comp%20Stand_07opt.pdf

14. Rubrics for Assessment, Northern Illinois University, Faculty Development and Instructional Design
Center, https://www.niu.edu/facdev/_pdf/guide/assessment/rubrics_for_assessment.pdf
15. Spady, William G., (1994), Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association
of School Administrators. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/ED380910.pdf.
16. Understanding Item Analysis, University of Washington, http://www. washington.edu/assessment/
scanning-coring/scoring/reports/item- analysis
17. Using Assessment Rubrics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney,https://teaching.unsw.edu.au/
assessment-rubrics

18. 25 Years Washington Accord: 1989-2014 Celebrating InternationalEngineering Standards and Recognition,
http://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/ Documents/History/25Years Washington Accord-
A5booklet-FINAL.pdf.

50 Evaluation Reforms in Higher Educational Institutions