Page 31 - EVALUATION ENGLISH
P. 31

Evaluation Reforms

                     Assessment                                   Group Tasks
                        Type         Group Discussion/ Fishbowl Technique / Role Play / Authentic Problem
                                                                    Solving
                      Limitations  Difficult  to  assess  individual  input;  Time  consuming  for  students  to organize;
                                   Some students might overshadow others; others might be a pull- back
                      Suggested    Once every semester with one make up and one term-end in certain courses
                      Frequency
                      Suggested    Groups formed must be roughly equivalent; Problems assigned  should be equivalent;
                        Usage      Each  team  member  must  have  a  specific  role;  Rubrics  for marking must be
                                   mutually decided including all domains of education

                     Assessment                              Rapid Fire Questions
                        Type
                       Nature      Questions on a topic asked very quickly and also answered very fast
                      Advantage    Good practice and evaluation of students’ level of understanding; Raises the level of
                                   cognitive challenge
                      Limitations  Shy students may not freely participate; May be difficult to assess on the spot
                      Suggested    May be embedded in classroom teaching as required
                      Frequency
                      Suggested    Students  should  be  told  the  criteria  of  a  good  question;  May  be  assessed  by  two
                        Usage      evaluators  for  greater  objectivity;  May  be  recorded  for  closer assessment.


                     Assessment                       Other Lesson- embedded Techniques
                        Type        WSQ (Watch- Summarise- question)/ One Question Quiz / Think-Pair- Share/
                                                                    Socratic
                       Nature      These  are  interspersed  within  a  regular  lesson  to  provide  formative feedback
                      Advantage    Excellent for formative assessment; Cumulative output can be used for grading
                                   purposes as well; Make students alert and active in the class
                      Limitations  Require additional class time
                      Suggested    Every lesson as per need
                      Frequency
                    Integrated Mode
                     Assessment                                Field Assignments
                        Type
                       Nature      Field visit with report
                      Advantage    Authentic form of assessment; Develops observation and recording skills; Requires
                                   organisation skill
                      Limitations  Costly to supervise; Difficult to timetable; Need to consider ethical and safety issues
                      Suggested    Once in a Semester
                      Frequency
                      Suggested    Students must be exposed to note taking and report writing skills; If visiting
                        Usage      different sites reports may be presented in class for sharing of experiences &
                                   learning

                     Assessment                           Seminar/Paper Presentations
                        Type
                       Nature      Group or individual work depending on class strength
                      Advantage    No doubt regarding authenticity of presenter; Students take presentations seriously;
                                   Can be used for individual or group work; Questions and answer sessions as follow ups
                                   can help develop important skills; Students learn from their own and everyone else’s
                                   presentations; Opportunities of peer feedback



                   Evaluation Reforms in Higher Educational Institutions                                   29
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36