Page 37 - EVALUATION ENGLISH
P. 37

Evaluation Reforms

                   ii.  The  schedule  and  pattern  of  continuous  assessment/evaluation  should  be  decided  by
                       the concerned institution in advance and publicized to all students and faculty through
                       the institutional regulations and the student’s information brochure. The components of
                       internal assessment/evaluation are to have a time frame for completion by students with
                       concurrent  and  continuous  evaluation  of  faculty  members.  Following  the  principle  of
                       “those who teach should evaluate”, the continuous internal assessment/evaluation have
                       to be conducted by the teacher and the evaluation outcome should be expressed by pre-
                       determined marks or by grades. Tests that are prepared by teachers and conducted during
                       academic teaching are considered of high value as opposed to the end of term tests that are
                       more threatening in nature. However, teachers have to include elements of self-assessment
                       or peer-assessment during construction of such tests.
                   iii.  In order to ensure transparency, fair-play and accountability, the evaluation report submitted
                       by al the faculty members are to be reviewed from time to time by a committee of the
                       institution constituted by the appropriate authority.
                   iv.  The outcome of the internal evaluation reviewed by the committee is to be announced and
                       displayed on the notice board as per the time frame of the academic calendar.

                   v.   The proportion of Internal evaluation (IE) to External Evaluation (EE) should be specified
                       for UG ( 30:70) and for PG ( 40:60). The proportion of IE can be low to start with . It
                       can be raised progressively in a phased manner to 50% depending on the outcome of the
                       experience. Though this may be accepted in principle, putting it into practice needs issues
                       to be addressed and weeded out.

                   However, care has to be taken that schemes of internal assessment should not adhere to a
                   standard system or mode or type. Relevant types of internal assessment have to be developed
                   suiting the needs and requirement of each specific subject. There is no one size that fits all.
                   Teachers need continued support and training through workshops to successfully implement
                   such internal assessment schemes otherwise an improper handling will lead to perception by
                   students doubting its integrity and impartiality.






































                   Evaluation Reforms in Higher Educational Institutions                                   35
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42