Page 74 - Academic and Research Book_WEB
P. 74

American culture are not more than five hundred years old but the supremacy it claims and enjoys
              over the world is worth noticing. As compared to them India has a legacy of five thousand years with
              innumerable positive ideas, objects, theories, cultures, and languages to boast about but the humility,
              selflessness,  and  spiritual  orientation  of  our  lifestyle  across  all  Indian  communities  does  not  allow
              us to blow our trumpets. But it is necessary to make the world aware of the contribution of Indian
              languages,  especially  of  the  Sanskrit  language.  Instead  of  repetitive  topics  such  as  translations  and
              literary appreciations of famous works or the character-sketches of the roles in dramas, it is necessary
              to bring to light the value-orientation of such compositions. Even after the hundreds of attacks by
              foreign invaders India is firmly rooted in its culture because of the eternal values, which are inculcated
              in  the  minds  of  natives  from  their  childhood.  In  this  era  of  competition  for  supremacy,  greed
              for wealth, land, and power, the human mind is restless and is in search of peace. It can certainly
              be  provided  through  the  literature  in  Indian  languages  in  general  and  in  the  Sanskrit  language  in
              particular. Even the Indian canons of critical appreciation, which are used by the Western critiques is
              the literary contribution of India to the world. The linguistic theories propounded by Bhartrihari, the
              stalwart of the philosophy of grammar, are immensely appreciated by foreign scholars such as Noam
              Chomsky. Current language research should take note of these points, take this research ahead, and
              prove the Indian supremacy over other languages of the world, which Sanskrit has already done.


              Ethics in Language Research


              What exactly is conveyed by “research ethics”? It is concerned with the moral issues that arise during
              or as a result of research activities, as well as the ethical conduct of researchers. Harvard Ethicist Louis
              M.  Guanine  describes  the  ‘kernel’  of  intellectual  honesty  to  be,  “A  virtuous  disposition  to  eschew
              deception when given an incentive for deception” (Guanine, 2005).

              The term “research ethics” is the product of medical research and research in other fields such as social
              sciences, information technology, biotechnology, and engineering, which may generate different types
              of ethical concerns to those in medical research (Iphofen, 2011). Intellectual honesty is an important
              component of any research and so also in research in language. It is an applied method of problem-
              solving characterized by an unbiased, honest attitude, which can be demonstrated in several different
              ways says Wikipedia.  These are listed here and clear measures are needed for the ethical governance
                                 8
              of research to ensure that:

              •    Personal beliefs or politics do not interfere with the pursuit of truth.
              •    Relevant  facts  and  information  are  not  purposefully  omitted  even  when  such  things  may
                   contradict one’s hypothesis.
              •    Facts are presented in an unbiased manner, and not twisted to give misleading impressions or to
                   support one view over another.
              •    References, or earlier works, are acknowledged where possible and plagiarism is avoided.
              •    Intentionally committed fallacies in debates and reasoning are called intellectual dishonesty.

              As mentioned earlier, dishonesty comes in the way of the pursuit of truth for various reasons discussed
              above. It is not expected from the research to have positive results, supporting the hypothesis all the
              while but one has to accept the results, which may be contrary to the hypothesis as well. Genuine
              research includes both: positive and negative results and at that time the researcher has to analyse the
              negative results and find out the reasons for that, or state and accept them boldly. If the researcher
              hesitates to record the findings that are contrary to his or her hypothesis there is every possibility
              of twisting the results to suit the hypothesis, which would be a transgression of research ethics. The






                                                              ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND RESEARCH QUALITY | 63
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79