Page 115 - Academic and Research Book_WEB
P. 115

CHAPTER 13





                                    Databases and Research Metrics


                                                   Manmohan Gupta




              Introduction

              It  is  widely  acknowledged  that  the  21st  century  is  being  driven  by  innovation  and  knowledge
              creation, which are also the key drivers of the economic development for any country as already
              borne out by the last two decades of the 21st century. Generating, storing, and to meaningfully use
              the data related to research outputs are crucial ingredients for innovation and knowledge creation
              in  any  country.  Data  management  and  data  mining  tools,  play  an  important  role  in  the  present
              context, which is related to the scholarly research activity and the related conundrums created by
              the  exponentially  rising  sources  of  scholarly  academic  literature.  We  are  particularly  interested
              in  the  scholarly  literature  stored  in  many  well-known  and  ever-increasing  databases  for  storing
              scholarly literature.
              After  the  Second  World  War,  the  world  witnessed  an  unprecedented  growth  of  research  and
              academic activity, not limited to the field of science. This presented unprecedented challenges on
              all  fronts  of  academic  activity,  from  the  human  resource  management  of  institutions  of  higher
              education  and  research  to  the  deeper  issues  of  ethics  in  the  academics.  In  fact,  this  is  further
              complicated  by  the  fact  that  most  academic  activity  has  undergone  transition  from  pursuits  to
              professional  activity.  When  the  number  of  people  involved  in  research  and  related  activity  are
              limited,  a  peer  group-led  approach  is  very  practical  and  tangible  in  evaluating  research  output,
              among other parameters, of any individual and the related issue of ethics also is essentially related
              to the integrity of a peer group. However, things become complicated when there is exponential
              increase  in  the  persons  involved  in  such  activity  and  there  is  a  mind-boggling  output  of  highly
              diversified research. By a rough estimate, at present more than two million scholarly documents are
              created every year. Storage, documentation, and accessibility of these exponentially rising number
              of documents is undoubtedly a gigantic problem.

              With  the  proliferation  of  data,  it  becomes  important  to  find  quality  markers  for  publications  and
              journals, which are ever-increasing in number. The questions related to multidimensional research
              and collaborations have also opened the issues related to the quality of institutional contributions as
              well as that of the country. This has also complicated the matter of objectively assessing the quality
              and contributions of a given author, particularly in large multinational collaborations. Although there
              is no foolproof objective way to quantify the research contribution of an individual or an institution,
              one can attempt to reach as far as possible in achieving this goal.
              In  such  a  mind-boggling  situation,  research  evaluation  is  continuously  proving  to  be  a  tough  job.
              With the limitations of peer reviews when the number of cases become large, one has to supplement
              it  with  other  objective  means.  The  objective  here  is  to  understand  the  basic  features  of  databases
              and the related quality markers. We discuss the most popular databases in detail, which researchers
              and scholars use as well as we briefly discuss the parameters, which measure the quality of research
              journals as well as the scientific outputs of individuals and institutions.









              104 | University Grants Commission
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120