Page 97 - Academic and Research Book_WEB

Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara (MSUB) which has prepared a “Research Handbook” of the
University.

References

Alfredo, K. and H. Hart. 2011. The University and the Responsible Conduct of Research: Who is
responsible for what? Science and Engineering Ethics 17: 447–457.

Anderson, M.S., K.S. Louis, and J. Earle 1994. Disciplinary and Departmental Effects on Observa-
tions of Faculty and Graduate Student Misconduct. Journal of Higher Education 65: 331–350.
Bennett, R. and J. Knibbs. 1986. Researching for a Higher Degree: The role(s) of the super-visor.
Management Education and Development 17(2): 137–145.

Burr, V. and N. King. 2012. ‘You’re in Cruel England Now!’ Teaching Research Ethics through

Reality Television. Psychology Learning & Teaching 11: 22–29.
Case, J. 2008. Alienation and Engagement: Development of an alternative theoretical framework for
understanding student learning. Higher Education 55 (3): 321–332.

Gray, P.W. and S.R. Jordan. 2012. Supervisors and Academic Integrity: Supervisors as exemplars and
mentors. Journal of Academic Ethics 10: 299–311.

Goodyear, R.K., C.A. Crego, and M.W. Johnston. 1992. Ethical Issues in the Supervision of Student
Research: A study of critical incidents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 23 (3): 203–210.

Kitchener, K.S. 1985. Ethical Principles and Ethical Decisions in Student Affairs. New Directions for
Student Services, 30, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.37119853004.

Kitchener, K.S. 2000. Foundations of Ethical Practice, Research, and Teaching in Psychology. © 2021
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

[ https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-07015-000, Accessed on 2nd May, 2021]

Löfström, E. and K. Pyhältö. 2012. The Supervisory Relationship as an Arena for Ethical Problem-
solving. Education Research International, article ID 961505, 12 p. http://www.hindawi.com/journals/
edu/2012/961505/
Löfström, E. and K. Pyhältö. 2014. Ethical Issues in Doctoral Supervision — The perspectives of PhD
students in the natural and behavioural sciences. Ethics & Behaviour 24: 195–214.

Mahmud, S. and T. Bretag. 2013. Postgraduate Research Students and Academic Integrity: It’s about
good research training. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 35(4): 432–443.

Meyer, J.H.F., M.P. Shanahan, and R.C. Laugksch. 2005. Students’ Conceptions of Research: A
qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 49: 225–244.

Pyhältö, K., J. Stubb, and J. Tuomainen. 2011. International Evaluation of Research and Doctoral
Education at the University of Helsinki — To the top and out to society. Summary report on doctoral
students’ and principal investigators’ doctoral training experiences. Accessed May 23, 2012 at

http://wiki.helsinki.fi/display/evaluation2011/Survey+on+doctoral+training.

Sutherland, K. 2013. The 40-40-20 ‘Myth’ Meets the 24/7 ‘Reality’: Investigating the experiences of
early career academics. Keynote presentation at the Conference Higher Education – Higher Level
Learning. Tallinn, Estonia, January 23–25, 2013.

86 | University Grants Commission