Page 42 - Academic and Research Book_WEB
P. 42

Conclusion


              •    We in India have already set up mechanisms to ensure academic integrity, to prevent plagiarism
                   by Indian researchers, and to penalize our researchers when they do wrong.

              •    We must similarly set up new mechanisms to enhance the visibility of Indian research output, to
                   ensure that it receives due credit and is not ignored.

              •    We need to change our servile mentality of living with humility (aankhein jhukakar) and teach
                   our young researchers that they have to live with self-respect (aankhein milakar). We must set
                   up mechanisms to provide support to our researchers when we are wronged, just as we in India
                   have set up mechanisms to penalize our researchers when we do wrong. Such new mechanisms
                   would ensure that Indian work is not ignored and receives due credit.
              •    We must provide support to our researchers when they are wronged (by someone from abroad
                   taking their work or idea and passing it off as their own) and denied due credit.
              •    My dictum to combating plagiarism is, “one should be neither a perpetrator, nor a victim, of
                   plagiarism”.  There  are  various  precautions  that  I  have  suggested  earlier  (Chaddah,  2018a,  op.
                   cit.) to ensure that we cannot be scooped, and that we can register and protect ownership of
                   our novel ideas in an academically accepted way. Designing our research problems, utilizing
                   Chanakya’s philosophy, will ensure that we are not scooped. This was outside the scope of this
                   Chapter  but  has  been  discussed  elsewhere  (ibid.).  Registering  and  protecting  ownership  will
                   benefit from the proposed mechanism under the aegis of UGC.


              References

              Bhagwat, K.V. and P. Chaddah. 1992. Magnetisation Curves for a Hard Superconductor Sample in the
              Shape of a General Ellipsoid. Physica C.  92: 444.

              Banerjee, A., A.K. Pramanik, K. Kumar, and P. Chaddah, et al. 2006.  Coexisting Tunable Fractions of
              Glassy and Equilibrium Long-range-order Phases in Manganites. J Phys: Condens. Matter 18: L605.

              Banerjee, A., K. Kumar, and P. Chaddah. 2009. Conversion of Glassy Antiferromagnetic-insulating
              Phase  to  Equilibrium  Ferromagnetic-metallic  Phase  by  Devitrification  and  Recrystallization  in  Al
              Substituted Pr Ca MnO  J Phys: Condens. Matter 21:  026002.
                           0.5  0.5  3.
              Chaddah, P. 2011. Protecting Our ‘Emerging Bylines’ from Plagiarism. Current Science 101:  1261.
              Chaddah, P. 2014. Not All Plagiarism Requires a Retraction. Nature  511: 127.

              Chaddah,  P.  2015.  Magnetic  Field  Induced  1st  Order  Transitions:  Recent  studies,  and  some  new
              concepts. AIP Conference Proceedings 1661: 030002.

              Chaddah, P. 2018a. Ethics in Competitive Research: Do not get scooped to not get plagiarized. (ISBN-
              978-9387480865). Pothi.com, Mudranik Technologies, Bengaluru.
              Chaddah,  P.  2018b.  First  Order  Phase  Transitions  of  Magnetic  Materials:  Broad  and  interrupted
              transitions.  (ISBN-978-1498786256). Boca Raton, USA:  CRC Press.

              Chaddah, P. 2019. Plagiarism of Scientific Ideas: An Indian victim’s travails of partial closures. (ISBN-
              978-9389147087). Pothi.com, Bengaluru: Mudranik Technologies.
              Chaddah,  P.  and  V.C.  Sahni.  1975.  On  the  Choice  of  Gamma-ray  Sources  for  Compton  Profile
              Studies.  Phys. Stat. Sol. (a)  32: 677.







                                                              ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND RESEARCH QUALITY | 31
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47