Page 159 - Academic and Research Book_WEB
P. 159

women faculty, women students were at a clear disadvantage in finding mentors. This situation seems
              to have changed as far as the college and university scenario in India is concerned. Probably now we
              have a sufficient senior women faculty who can serve as mentors, although in some disciplines their
              number may not be adequate even today.
              A  detailed  survey-based  study  (Sands,  et  al.,  1991),  revealed  that  only  about  a  third  of  graduate
              students and assistant professors were mentored by a colleague at the university in which the study
              was conducted. The largest proportion of mentors described by male and female protégés in this study
              were full professors. Another noteworthy observation was that mentoring between faculty seemed to
              be a voluntary arrangement. Departments rarely assigned mentoring relationships. The article also
              pointed out that mentoring of young faculty by senior faculty of the same department faced some
              problems. The protégés found themselves in an unequal and vulnerable position in relation to the
              persons who, sometime in the future, may be making decisions about their promotion, etc. This is
              indeed a valid point and needs to be addressed in the suggestions for future mentoring programmes.

              The  essential  qualities  of  a  mentor:  A  mentor  should  be  an  established  person  in  his  profession;
              possess  core  values,  and  be  able  to  spare  his/her  time  for  this  noble  cause.  The  mentor  has  to  be
              inclusive  and  interested  in  continual  learning.  Unfortunately,  there  is  no  instrument  to  measure
              these  qualities  and  therefore  objectivity  in  choosing  mentors  is  a  crucial  part  of  the  mentorship
              programme for the Ph.D. students and young faculty. This commitment should be for at least two
              years. Preliminary suggestions for formulating the guidelines of a nationwide mentorship programme
              under the auspices of the UGC and AICTE are given below.
              1.   The programme will be open to all the Ph.D. students during the first two years after registration
                   as well as to the recently recruited young assistant professors working in Indian colleges and
                   universities. Participation will be voluntary and with the approval of the research supervisor
                   and the head of the concerned department as applicable. A protégé will have two mentors: an
                   alumnus mentor and a faculty mentor. He/she will receive mentoring for two years after being
                   admitted  to  the  programme,  typically  for  one  session  of  two  hours  every  month  from  each
                   mentor.
              2.   The alumni mentors will be selected from the senior, distinguished alumni of the concerned
                   department.  Most  college  and  university  departments,  which  are  active  in  research,  have
                   produced many Ph. Ds who have reached top positions in academia, industry, or other walks of
                   life. Many of them retain a sense of attachment to their alma mater and are willing to spare their
                   time for it. However, we have not made any systematic attempt to seek their contribution for
                   furthering the standards of our academic departments in colleges and universities in India. Each
                   department needs to compile a list of the distinguished, senior alumni who are physically active
                   and are willing to spare two hours of their valuable time every month for mentoring one or two
                   protégés assigned to them. The desirous alumni should be requested to submit a statement of
                   interest with a one-page CV and all contact details.
              3.   Active and retired faculty members from a college/university should be similarly selected. In this
                   way, a central pool of academic mentors can be made after careful selection, based on academic
                   experience and research achievements, keeping the criterion of inclusiveness in mind.
              4.   The lists and CVs of the selected mentors can then be made available to the Ph.D. students and
                   young faculty. They will select one or two mentors each from the two lists with the advice of
                   their Ph.D. supervisor and a senior professor or the head of the department (HOD) respectively.
                   The mentor will select two or three protégés from the list and work with them for the next two
                   years. There will not be more than three protégés working with a mentor at any time.








              148 | University Grants Commission
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164