Page 14 - Academic and Research Book_WEB
P. 14

publications in high IF journals. A pedestrian ‘follower’ paper from India can appear in a high IF
                   journal for various reasons, including but not limited to the patronage sometimes extended by
                   a First World referee towards an author from the Global South, a sense of unwritten obligation
                   as it were, or a tendency to ‘allow’ an Indian follower in the same field to publish in a high IF
                   journal if he/she cites a big ‘leader’ scientist from the First World. Such a ‘leader’ may well be
                   the referee; the Indian paper gets published but it is never cited. Such ‘follower’ papers from the
                   Global South will not be cited where it really matters.
                   Indian committees for appointments, assessments or awards at the Central Government level
                   often go, sadly enough, by IFs of the publication journals of candidates. These committees are
                   necessarily of a general composition. They cannot be expected to go into the finer but more
                   crucial details of the candidates’ research to discriminate between truly insightful and adequately
                   competent work. It is not a surprise therefore that average academics get elevated to positions of
                   authority in India because it is normally only the receipt of such awards that elevates one to such
                   positions.

              2)   Policy makers and administrators worldwide have been concerned for some time that research
                   is being paid for twice over: the first time when it is funded and the second time when journal
                   subscriptions are paid. Scientists should not be charged twice — once to undertake research and
                   then to view its outcomes. This has led to the appearance of a new type of journal, the open
                   access (OA) publication. In an OA journal, an author pays a one-time fee to publish a paper.
                   Subsequently, its access is open to anyone. So if a government funding agency earmarks a certain
                   amount (say 15 per cent) of a research grant towards OA fees, it would pay for research just
                   once. The OA model has been successful and excellent OA journals now exist. The model has
                   been widely adopted by European governments and there is little doubt that India should follow
                   this path, because it is the future.
              On  the  other  hand,  however,  UGC  regulatory  provisions  for  appointment  and  accreditation,
              especially  in  smaller  colleges  and  universities,  led  to  predatory  journals  adopting  a  perverted
              version of OA. These journals more or less publish any submitted paper without the usual protocols
              of screening, refereeing, revising, and editing. Predatory journals are also able to fix IFs through
              fake  citations.  These  dubious  practices  exploit  the  desperation  of  researchers  who  have  found
              this  loophole  to  attain  eligibility  for  appointments,  promotions,  and  accreditations  through  a
              certain number of points to be accrued from publications. Consequently, bribe and be published
              has  become  the  norm.  Regrettably,  India  heads  the  list  of  countries  in  terms  of  the  number  of
              predatory journals published (64 per cent) and 11 per cent of authors publish in these journals.
              According to the Nature Index (2014), a large percentage of research articles in India published in
              predatory journals are defined as, “entities that prioritize self-interest at the expense of scholarship
              and are characterized by false or misleading information, deviation from best editorial/publication
              practices, lack of transparency, and/or use of aggressive and indiscriminate solicitation practices.”
              This is a disgrace to all individuals, employers, and institutions. “Retraction Watch” is full of papers
              from Indian academics, indicating potential compromise of academic integrity, publication ethics
              as also the quality of research and publication.



              Emergence of Predatory Journals

              Unethical/deceptive practices in publishing have led to an increased number of predatory journals
              worldwide.  Predatory  journals  have  severely  compromised  the  integrity  of  scientific  scholarship
              and  polluted  electronic  databases.  Predatory  journals  and  publishers  are,  “entities  that  prioritize
              self-interest at the expense of scholarship and are characterized by false or misleading information,






                                                               ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND RESEARCH QUALITY | 3
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19