Page 106 - Academic and Research Book_WEB
P. 106

CHAPTER 11





                         Sooner or Later Ethical Violations Get Exposed


                                          Ramesh Ch. Deka and Ajanta Deka


              In recent times, there have been many instances of ethical violations in research. We present here
              some examples of violations of ethical practices in executing scientific research. We deliberate on the
              three “cardinal sins” of scientific misconduct, FFP — Fabrication, Falsification, and Plagiarism. The
              duplication of research articles is also highlighted. Such unethical practices cannot be hidden for long.
              It is just a matter of time before such activities get uncovered.

              ‘Ethics’ refers to norms of conduct that distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.
              Research ethics is the application of moral rules and professional codes of conduct to the collection,
              analysis,  reporting  and  publication  of  information  about  research  subjects,  in  particular  active
              acceptance of subjects’ right to privacy, confidentiality and informed consent.  In research, adherence
                                                                                     1
              to  ethical  norms  is  very  important.  While  there  are  several  reasons  for  this,  the  notable  ones  are
              promotion  of  aims  of  research  and  developing  values  that  are  essential  for  collaborative  work,
              accountability to the public and uplifting moral and social values. We learn our first lesson on ethics at
              home. Religious background also helps in building strong ethics in research. Apart from the learning
              from family and friends, students learn research ethics from their research advisor, fellow students,
              other faculty members at the Institute, discussions in the laboratories, seminars, and courses dealing
              with ethical issues.

              When a student joins a group as a researcher, he/she is expected to adhere to three sets of obligations
              (Kamat, 2015):
              1.   Honour the trust that the research mentor or the university administrators;

              2.   Discover or invent something new; and
              3.   Do something useful for the society.
              However, irresponsible conduct in research can make it impossible to achieve significant outcomes.
              The  findings  of  any  research  have  to  be  shared  in  the  form  of  paper  publications  or  conference
              presentations. Publishing a research article is the culmination of months, and sometimes years, of
              meticulous planning, execution, and analyses of hundreds of experiments or calculations (Benos, et
              al., 2005).In most cases, funds for research projects come from public money. Therefore, it is expected

              that  research  works  will  be  honestly  conducted  and  reported  in  the  form  a  patent  or  publication
              in a reputed journal. There is nothing like ,“only I can do this kind of work” in science. If “I can”
              then it is doable by anybody else. If the research is not published, then one cannot claim that it was
              done. According to Whitesides (2004), “A paper is an organized description of hypotheses, data and
              conclusions, intended to instruct the reader. If your research does not generate papers, it might just as
              well not have been done.” Publishing a research paper is a team effort involving authors, editors, and
              reviewers. People who make direct and significant intellectual contribution to the design of research,
              interpretation  of  data,  explanation  of  results,  or  writing  of  the  manuscript  should  be  included  as
              authors. Inclusion of honorary, guest, or gift authors is not part of the ethical practice of research
              publications.  While  choosing  editors  or  reviewers  one  should  be  cautious  not  to  include  friends.
              Choosing people who will not challenge one’s research in any way is also a violation of ethics as the
              primary purpose of the reviewing process get defeated. Critical but objective reviewers, who point






                                                              ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND RESEARCH QUALITY | 95
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111