Page 372 - Compendium of UGC Regulations 1957-2023
P. 372

Regulations pertaining to Accreditation of HEIs:



                       (r)   “University” means a university established or incorporated by or under a Central Act,
                             a Provincial Act or a State Act, and includes an Institution Deemed to be University;
                             Words and expressions used and not defined in these regulations but defined in the
                             University Grants Commission Act, 1956 and not inconsistent with these regulations
                             shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Act.
                  3.   Objectives

                       3.1  To lay down a framework for mandatory  assessment and accreditation  of Higher
                             Educational Institutions and/or programmes including Technical Education Programmes
                             conducted therein, allowing setting up of Assessment and Accrediting Agencies (AAAs)
                             by Government or Semi Government agencies, apart from the existing accreditation
                             institutions namely National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) and the
                             National Board of Accreditation (NBA).
                       3.2.  To lay down procedures and criteria for registration of AAAs .
                       3.3  To regulate AAAs through an independent but accountable institutional mechanism.
                  4.   Setting up of an Accreditation Advisory Council by Commission for Regulation of AAAs

                       4.1.  To advise the Commission on functions referred at 4.3 below, the Commission shall
                             appoint an Accreditation Advisory Council (AAC) comprising up to 10 members who
                             shall be distinguished academicians, experts in the field of higher education, assessment
                             and accreditation. Initially, Members of the AAC shall be identified and recommended
                             by a Committee appointed by the Ministry of Human Resource Development through
                             a well defined credible transparent and merit based process.
                       4.2  The AAC shall follow a transparent and merit-based process of selection of AAAs
                             and make recommendation to the Commission for registration. The Commission shall
                             thereupon notify the AAAs.
                       4.3  Commission in consultation with the AAC shall, subject to the provisions of these
                             regulations  and of those made  under any law for the time  being in force by the
                             appropriate statutory regulatory authority, take measures to develop and regulate the
                             process of assessment and accreditation of Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) and
                             programme(s) conducted therein., and to monitor the functioning of AAAs.
                       4.4  Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions, the measures referred
                             to in sub-clause(1) of clause (3), may, inter alia, provide for all or any of the following
                             matters, namely:—
                             (a)  regulate AAAs (registration of the assessment and accreditation agencies);
                             (b)  lay down norms and processes for assessment and accreditation  of academic
                                  quality in HEI(s) or of programme(s) including Technical Education Programmes
                                  conducted therein, by AAAs;
                             (c)  undertake  periodical review  of  norms and  policies  referred  to  in  sub-clause
                                  mentioned above at (b);
                             (d)  lay down a code of ethics;

                             (e)  undertake audit of AAAs, disclosure of information and evolving of transparency
                                  in the processes of assessment and accreditation;

                             (f)   lay down policies for providing information to the public in regard to all aspects
                                  of quality and performance of HEI(s) and programme(s) conducted therein;

                             (g)  determine  levying  of  fees  or  other  charges  for  carrying  out  assessment  and
                                  accreditation under these Regulations;

                                                                                                                 371
                                                                                University Grants Commission
   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377