|
The world has undergone an
enormous amount of transformation in the last couple of years. It is steadily
heading towards a real dichotomy between “knowledge creators” and “Service
Providers”. Those of us who would work beyond their comfort zones and
attain excellence in their chosen field will join the block of “knowledge
creators” and the rest will have to compromise with the various tiers
of ‘Service Providers’. Knowledge creators, whose birth place will be
the institutions of higher learning, are going to be the real wealth creators.
This is precisely the reason why nations after nations are according topmost
priority to higher education. There are countries where the net entry
rate for first degree vis-a-vis the relevant age group is quite high.
It is as high as 71% in Finland, 70% in New Zealand, 67% in Sweden, 59%
both in Australia & Norway, 48% in Spain, 46% in UK, 43% in USA and 39%
in Japan. There are also countries like Indonesia and India where it is
only 11% and 7% respectively. Currently, we are passing through the phase
when we are faced with extraordinary pressure to make our higher education
more accessible, more relevant and also more affordable. I am of the opinion
that our discussions and decisions pertaining to higher education should
not be limited unto tenth five year plan. Instead, it should be made in
the light of tenth, eleventh and twelfth five year plans, for the impact
of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and Secondary Education would be visible in greater
strength during XI & XII plans. We need to ensure that the opportunity
that higher education brings is available to those who have the potential
to benefit from them regardless of their background. This could be facilitated
by ensuring greater convergence between conventional and distance mode.
At the same time we have to make it relevant to keep pace with the changing
time. This might call for revisiting existing curricula with a view to
ensuring that every student of ours has access to a rich world class curriculum
that also takes care of country’s cultural and ethnic diversity. Though
the social and economic consideration for expanding the provision of higher
education are extremely strong, we should not compromise on quality as
we expand. We need to specify a well balanced academic menu
|
|
that suits to every student’s individuality
and creativity including that of the disadvantaged ones. And, when
we do that we should focus on the development of both cognitive
as well non-cognitive capacities of the learners rather than focusing
only on the former. |
 |
|
We must make it amply clear that
there is more to education than learning simple things like acquiring
information & skills. I do believe that education can not proceed
without the teaching of values even if indirectly. But there is
a difference between a conscious and an unconscious effort.
In the entire process of teaching and
learning we also have to work out methods for authentic assessment
of students’ potential. This could be achieved by employing multiple
criteria, multiple techniques and multiple sources of assessment.
All this, undoubtedly, require committed teaching work force.
In this endeavour we should encourage and support individual faculty
member to produce, present, publish and perpetuate new knowledge
in their own areas of specialization. We also have to strengthen
our existing procedures that will ensure access to all teachers
to high quality professional development using various modes available
in the present era.
|
| Having regard to the above, we need
to launch a number of initiatives to augment higher education in
the country. One such initiative is to reviving the UGC newsletter
which I am certain would keep all the stakeholders posted about
the news and latest developments in higher education. I take this
opportunity to congratulate the editorial team for their relentless
efforts in bringing out the newsletter in its present form. |

(VED PRAKASH)
|
|